| 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Israel's Supreme Court sentences tycoon to 3 years in prison  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2018/09/02 22:44 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        Israel's Supreme Court has sentenced one of the country's most prominent businessmen to three years in prison for securities fraud. 
 
The court ruled Wednesday that former IDB Holding Corp. controlling shareholder Nochi Dankner will begin serving his prison term on Oct. 2 for his role in carrying out millions of dollars' worth of fraudulent transactions in an attempt to influence the share price of the troubled company. 
 
IDB took on millions of dollars in debt following a series of bad business deals. The courts wrested control of IDB from Dankner as a result. 
 
Dankner, a favorite of Israel's business community, was often credited with helping rescue Israel's economy at the height of a Palestinian uprising. Under his leadership, IDB became Israel's largest holding company and Dankner became a celebrity. 
 | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                German court mulls jail for some over Munich air pollution  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2018/08/27 10:05 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        A German newspaper reports that judges are considering jailing senior Bavarian officials for failing to take action against air pollution in Munich, home to automaker BMW. 
 
Daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported Monday that the southern German state's administrative court believes jailing officials may be the most effective way of forcing the Bavarian government to enforce emissions-cutting measures. 
 
Munich topped the ranks of 65 German cities that exceeded levels of harmful particles last year. Bavarian officials have refused to impose measures in the state capital — such as limited bans on driving diesel vehicles — despite heavy fines. 
 
According to the report, Bavarian judges want to seek legal guidance from the European Court of Justice on whether jailing officials — including state Environment Minister Marcel Huber and Governor Markus Soeder — would be permissible. | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Court, regulators clash over uranium project in South Dakota  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2018/08/11 16:33 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        Federal regulators recently abandoned a proposed survey of Native American cultural resources at a planned uranium mine site in the southwest part South Dakota, just days before a judge decided the survey is required by federal law. 
 
The contradictory actions could further complicate and prolong a regulatory review process that is already nearly a decade old, the Rapid City Journal reported. 
 
Powertech (USA) Inc., a subsidiary of Canada-based Azarga Uranium, wants to develop a mine 13 miles northwest of Edgemont, on the remote southwestern edge of the Black Hills. The project is named "Dewey-Burdock," for two old town sites in the area. 
 
The uranium would be mined by the "in situ" method, which involves drilling dozens of wells across a wide area. A liquid solution is pumped underground to dissolve the uranium and bring it to the surface, so it can be processed for use in nuclear power plants. 
 
Contention over the potential presence of Native American burial sites, artifacts and other cultural resources within the 17-square-mile area of the proposed mine has been ongoing since Powertech applied to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a license in 2009. Nevertheless, the commission granted the license in 2014, even as a dispute about the lack of an adequate cultural resources survey was still pending before the commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. 
 
 | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Nevada Supreme Court taking up execution case  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2018/08/10 16:34 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        The Nevada Supreme Court has stepped in to decide whether drug companies can try to stop the state from using their medications in a twice-postponed lethal injection of a condemned inmate who wants to die. 
 
A state court judge in Las Vegas cancelled hearings Thursday following an order late Wednesday from six of the high court's seven justices. 
 
Supreme Court intervention had been sought by the state attorney general's office regarding the execution of Scott Raymond Dozier. 
 
The judge had planned to hear drugmaker Sandoz's request to join a bid by Alvogen and Hikma Pharmaceuticals to prevent Nevada from using their products in a three-drug combination never before tried in any state. 
 
A Nevada death-row inmate whose execution has been postponed twice says the legal fight over his fate is taking a tortuous toll on him and his family and he wants his sentence carried out. 
 
Scott Raymond Dozier told The Associated Press that the state should, in his words, "just get it done, just do it effectively and stop fighting about it." 
 
Dozier's comments in a brief prison telephone call on Wednesday came a day before a third drug company is due to ask a state court judge in Las Vegas to let it join with two other firms suing to block the use of their products in executions. 
 
The companies say they publicly declared they didn't want their products used in executions and allege that Nevada improperly obtained their drugs. | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Supreme Court examines Kentucky's medical review panels  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2018/08/08 16:34 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        malpractice lawsuit. But in 2017, Kentucky's Republican-controlled legislature passed a law requiring all such lawsuits first be reviewed by a panel of doctors. 
 
The law gave the panel nine months to issue an opinion on whether the lawsuit is frivolous — yet section 14 of Kentucky's Constitution says every person has access to the courts "without ... delay." 
 
Claycomb's parents sued to block the new law, making Kentucky the latest state to have its medical review panels challenged in court. 
 
A circuit judge agreed the law was unconstitutional. But Republican Gov. Matt Bevin appealed that decision to the state Supreme Court, which heard arguments Wednesday. 
 
"This is a modern day version of the poll tax," said attorney J. Guthrie True, who represents Claycomb in a lawsuit he says has class action status to represent all patients. "This has one purpose, and that is to obstruct the courthouse door." 
 
Matthew Kuhn, an attorney for the governor, said the state Constitution's ban on delaying access to the courts only applies to the court system itself. It does not apply to the legislature, which he says has the power to impose rules on the court system. He noted Kentucky has other laws that limit when people can file lawsuits. For example, heirs wanting to sue the executor of an estate must wait at least six months after the executor has been appointed before they can do so. Kuhn says that law has never been challenged. 
 
Kuhn said the medical review process is helpful because it gets the two sides talking before a lawsuit is filed, which could jumpstart settlement discussions. It also makes sure both sides have all the evidence collected before they go to a judge. 
 
 | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
              
 |            
      
          
                
                   | 
                 
                 
                
                     				
                 
                    
                      
                        
		
	| 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		
			  | 
			
				
					Investment Fraud Litigation   | 
				  
			 | 
		  
		
		 
	 |   
 | 
                       
                     
										
                    								
                  
                    
	
                   								
		
                    
	    
                    
 
 
          
 | 
  
  
Securities fraud, also known as stock fraud and investment fraud, is a practice that induces investors to make purchase or sale decisions on the basis of false information, frequently resulting in losses, in violation of the securities laws. Securities Arbitration. Generally speaking, securities fraud consists of deceptive practices in the stock and commodity markets, and occurs when investors are enticed to part with their money based on untrue statements.  
 |  
 
  
  | 
                 
              | 
            
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
             | 
           
         
 The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Securities Law News as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case. | Affordable Law Firm Website Design by Law Promo | 
  
 
      	
	 |