| 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Appeals court reopens case involving payment to law firm  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2019/01/26 10:48 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        An appeals court on Friday ordered more proceedings in a legal fight involving Kentucky's governor and two of his political rivals over a $4 million payment to a law firm for negotiating a settlement on behalf of the state with the maker of OxyContin. 
 
A three-judge Kentucky Court of Appeals panel ruled unanimously that a summary judgment previously granted in the case was "premature" because it didn't allow more information to be reviewed. The ruling returned the case to a lower court, where it could have implications in this year's governor's race. 
 
"In this case, there was no opportunity to take discovery," Judge Christopher Shea Nickell said in writing for the appeals court panel. 
 
"Since there was no discovery, obviously there was no 'ample opportunity to complete discovery.' ... Thus, we do not even reach the question of whether there were any material issues of fact precluding summary judgment," he added. 
 
The ruling keeping the case alive drew quick praise from Republican Gov. Matt Bevin's administration. Bevin's general counsel, Steve Pitt, said additional information could shed light on why Kentucky's lawsuit against a large pharmaceutical company was settled "for pennies on the dollar." 
 
The case also involves Attorney General Andy Beshear, who already has declared himself a candidate for governor as a Democrat. Bevin and Beshear have been embroiled in several lawsuits since they took office. Bevin filed papers Friday to run for a second term. 
 
 | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Congress to Probe Report that Trump Directed Lawyer to Lie  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2019/01/21 15:58 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        The Democratic chairmen of two House committees pledged Friday to investigate a report that President Donald Trump directed his personal attorney to lie to Congress about negotiations over a real estate project in Moscow during the 2016 election. 
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said “we will do what’s necessary to find out if it’s true.” He said the allegation that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie in his 2017 testimony to Congress “in an effort to curtail the investigation and cover up his business dealings with Russia is among the most serious to date.” 
 
The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, said directing a subordinate to lie to Congress is a federal crime. 
 
The report by BuzzFeed News, citing two unnamed law enforcement officials, says that Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress and that Cohen regularly briefed Trump and his family on the Moscow project — even as Trump said he had no business dealings with Russia. | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Lawyer: Incapacitated woman who gave birth not in coma  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2019/01/20 16:02 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        A lawyer for the family of an incapacitated Arizona woman who gave birth in a long-term care facility said she is not in a coma as previously reported. 
 
The Arizona Republic reported Friday that attorney John Micheaels said the 29-year-old woman has “significant intellectual disabilities” and does not speak but has some ability to move, responds to sounds and is able to make facial gestures. 
 
Phoenix police have said the woman was the victim of a sexual assault and have disclosed little other information. 
 
 A Jan. 8 statement by San Carlos Apache Tribe officials said the woman, a tribal member, gave birth while in a coma. 
 
News media outlets have reported that the woman, who has not been publicly identified, was in a vegetative state at the facility where she spent many years. 
 
“The important thing here is that contrary to what’s been reported, she is a person, albeit with significant intellectual disabilities. She has feelings and is capable of responding to people she is familiar with, especially family,” Micheaels told the newspaper. | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Model in Russian court apologizes for US election claim  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2019/01/16 16:15 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        A Belarusian model and self-styled sex instructor who last year claimed to have evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election said Saturday that she apologizes to a Russian tycoon for the claim and won't say more about the matter. 
 
Anastasia Vashukevich made the statement in a Moscow court that was considering whether to keep her in jail as she faces charges of inducement to prostitution. The court extended her detention for three more days. 
 
Vashukevich's statement appears to head off any chance of her speaking to U.S. investigators looking into possible collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign. 
 
Vashukevich, who goes by the name Nastya Rybka on social media, was arrested in Thailand last February on prostitution charges. She and several others were arrested in connection with a sex training seminar they were holding in Thailand. 
 
After her arrest she claimed she had audio tapes of Russian tycoon Oleg Deripaska, who is close to President Vladimir Putin, talking about interference in the U.S. election. 
 
She had shot to world attention a few weeks earlier when a Russian opposition leader published an investigation based on her social media posts that suggested corrupt links between Deripaska and Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Prikhodko. The report featured video from Deripaska's yacht in 2016, when Vashukevich says she was having an affair with him. 
 
She was deported from Thailand on Thursday after pleading guilty and was detained when her flight arrived in Moscow, along with three other deportees including mentor Alexander Kirillov. 
 
She told journalists in the Moscow court that she has apologized to Deripaska and says "I will no longer compromise him." 
 
Deripaska is among the Russian tycoons and officials who have been sanctioned in recent years by the United States in connection with Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea. His business empire includes aluminum, energy and construction assets. 
 
He also once was a client of Paul Manafort, the former campaign manager for Trump. Manafort was convicted last year in the United States of tax and bank fraud. | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
                
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                   
                  
                     
                Court orders mediation in Maryland desegregation case  
                      Court Watch |    
                      2019/01/06 15:24 
                     | 
                   
                  
                    
                 
                      
                        A federal appeals court has ordered a fourth attempt at mediation in a long-running dispute over the state of Maryland’s treatment of its historically black colleges. 
 
The black colleges say the state has underfunded them while developing programs at traditionally white schools that directly compete with them and drain prospective students away. 
 
In 2013, a judge found that the state had maintained an unconstitutional “dual and segregated education system.” The judge said the state allowed traditionally white schools to replicate programs at historically black institutions, thereby undermining the success of the black schools. 
 
Despite three previous tries at mediation, the two sides have been unable to agree on a solution. 
 
On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Maryland’s higher education commission and the coalition to begin mediation again to try to settle the 12-year-old lawsuit. 
 | 
                       
                     
                 
	  | 
                                    
                  
|     
                    
 | 
 
 
 
                
              
              
 |            
      
          
                
                   | 
                 
                 
                
                     				
                 
                    
                      
                        
		
	| 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		 
		
		
		
			  | 
			
				
					Investment Fraud Litigation   | 
				  
			 | 
		  
		
		 
	 |   
 | 
                       
                     
										
                    								
                  
                    
	
                   								
		
                    
	    
                    
 
 
          
 | 
  
  
Securities fraud, also known as stock fraud and investment fraud, is a practice that induces investors to make purchase or sale decisions on the basis of false information, frequently resulting in losses, in violation of the securities laws. Securities Arbitration. Generally speaking, securities fraud consists of deceptive practices in the stock and commodity markets, and occurs when investors are enticed to part with their money based on untrue statements.  
 |  
 
  
  | 
                 
              | 
            
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
            |   | 
           
          
             | 
           
         
 The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Securities Law News as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case. | Affordable Law Firm Website Design by Law Promo | 
  
 
      	
	 |